Opposition to MAID comes from several directions.
Some religious authorities oppose MAID based on teachings about the sanctity of life and who may decide when life ends. Positions differ within and across Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim, and other religious communities.
Disability rights advocates have raised concerns that MAID laws create a system in which some lives are deemed less worth living. And that this could lead to pressure on disabled people to choose death rather than be a "burden." Organizations including Not Dead Yet have been among the most vocal opponents of MAID expansion.
Medical professional organizations are divided. The American Medical Association has historically opposed MAID but softened its position in 2019 to "engaged neutrality." Individual physicians vary widely in their willingness to participate.[3]
Proponents describe medical aid in dying as an autonomy issue for eligible adults with terminal illness. Opponents, including some disability advocates, raise concerns about prognosis uncertainty, unequal access to palliative and home care, dependency, coercion, and whether safeguards can identify every risk. Disabled people and disability organizations hold differing views. State statutes control eligibility, insurance treatment, required reporting, and death-certificate language.