Opposition to MAID comes from several directions.
Some religious authorities oppose MAID based on teachings about the sanctity of life and who may decide when life ends. Positions differ within and across Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim, and other religious communities.
Disability rights advocates have raised concerns that MAID laws create a system in which some lives are deemed less worth living. And that this could lead to pressure on disabled people to choose death rather than be a "burden." Organizations including Not Dead Yet have been among the most vocal opponents of MAID expansion.
Medical professional organizations are divided. The American Medical Association's Code of Medical Ethics opposes physician participation, says its position isn't neutral, and also says a physician who takes part legally after due moral consideration hasn't violated the Code.[11] Few physicians take part. A 2016 JAMA review found that fewer than 1% of licensed physicians in Oregon and Washington write these prescriptions in a given year.[3]
Proponents describe medical aid in dying as an autonomy issue for eligible adults with terminal illness. Opponents, including some disability advocates, raise concerns about prognosis uncertainty, unequal access to palliative and home care, dependency, coercion, and whether safeguards can identify every risk. Disabled people and disability organizations hold differing views. State statutes control eligibility, insurance treatment, required reporting, and death-certificate language.